Showing posts with label Caroline LeBlanc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Caroline LeBlanc. Show all posts

Friday, 15 July 2016

Powerful Desires: A Review of Christine Gelineau’s CRAVE, by Caroline LeBlanc


                                                                      
[T]ime is a horse, a runaway
none of us can dismount and so
the need is to find a way to enjoy the wind
that snatches handfuls of your hair as you race,
the horse’s mane, your man, the rhythm
and energy of the haunches powering under you,
their easy determination
to go on running.


from CRAVE by Christine Gelineau. NYQ Books, 2016
ISBN: 978-1-63045-020-5        buy CRAVE on Amazon

The front cover of Crave pictures the neck and head of a white horse on a white background.  It looks away from us, toward the edge of the page. Toward what it craves?  Any of you who know horse energy, as well as those who don’t, will find satisfaction for your poetic cravings between the book’s covers. 
Crave is a meaty, earthy book of narrative and lyric poems rooted in Christine Gelineu’s rural life on a horse farm. Many poems also concern matters beyond the farm. The book is divided into two sections: “Hard Evidence” consists of fifteen poems that recount what destructive cravings can cost the human soul and society, and “Crave” consists of 31 poems about cravings that push life along, through good times and bad, but ever forward. The half-dozen poems that have to do with horses left me feeling like the book is about horses, for that kind of energy drives the poems in this book about the powerful rhythms that fuel life in our earthly bodies. Also, in line with poetic trends, there are several Ekphrastic and other form poems in a text of predominantly free verse poems.
The poems in the first section, “Hard Evidence,” recount public and private events, both local and international.  They touch on the personal cost of ignorance, betrayal, criminal behavior, and just plain difficult circumstances.  They are heavy reading, and could discourage one from reading on, but that would be a mistake, so please, keep turning the pages.  
“What Men Do” is one of Gelineau’s horse poems from this first section. It combines a personal story about an injured farm cat that had to be put down with an account of World War I Australian soldiers who brought their horses to war, but were not allowed to bring them home for fear of carrying new diseases back to their island country.  The personal event: “While he aims, hesitates, she/waits. He shoots,/then again to be sure.//Apologists call it “the final kindness.”/What men do when they live up/to what is owed.”  These sentiments will be familiar to anyone who has had to have a cat euthanized, particularly if one is acquainted with rural and farm life.  The Australian story is much less common, and I was glad of the preparation the cat story provided.
                That final night together,
               the hardened young soldiers
                gathered their horses for a race meet,
                to drink in one last time that joy
                in what their bodies could do.
                Race over, they swiped and curried
                the sweated necks, sleek flanks,
                disentangled forelocks,
                fed their darlings tobacco and fruits
                then each laid his pistol
                in the hollow above his horse’s eye
                and squeezed.
Some of us spend time pondering the cost of war—in money, lives taken and damaged.  How many of us ponder the cost of war to animals—horses, dogs, dolphins we recruit, or animals we simply encounter in the execution of war in theater. And to the animal soul of people attached to these creatures.
The poems in Part 2, “Crave” I would characterize as life cycle love poems:  love of the physical life, the land and the world, love in birth and death, animal love, family and maternal love, love of art, married love, romantic love, and sexual passion ( of corn, among other things). For me a number of poems, some mentioned below, also hint at tribute to great poets who have gone before.
“Orbit,” the first poem in the section is an ars poetica prose poem that puts me in the mind of Maya Angelou’s ‘Phenomenal Woman.”  It is a sassy, musical dance with “verbs hot enough to broil a sausage on, even cooled it is too saucy for the gander.”  It joyously tugs and grinds the reader out of the somberness of the first section of the book.
“Felt like a Thought” is about the wonders of the fall season in the Northeastern United States. The references to “the tumult of geese chevrons/clamorously rowing the skies overhead,” provide an almost iconic image of the region referenced by so many poets, including Mary Oliver. 
“Anniversary in Paris,” about the love of the long married, references the trend of young lover to place a padlock on le Pont de l’ArchevĂȘchĂ©.  “[T]hey kiss and toss the key to the Seine./Forty years into our marriage we know better than to think of love/as a lock.”
“Curing” tells the story of life in a family house from the time of its building, to the raising and sending off of children and generations of horses. “These days I stand in the past even when I am/most present, most in the present, my memories the element/through which I experience experience. Is this richness?//or rigidity?”  A phenomenon and question well known to those of a certain age.
The first two lines of “Grace,” a poem about a dying friend are: “If you’re lucky, at some point/ordinary life becomes itself: something to inhabit, rather than/something to pass through. “ A better description of an embodied life is hard to find.
Let’s close with some lines from two of my favorite poems: “Love Among the Long-married” and “To-Do List for the Final Decades,” both of which evoke the joys of enduring marital love.  First from “Love Among the Long-married:”
                For their thirty-fifth wedding anniversary,
                the long-married plant a tree.
                Yes, they are exactly
                that stubborn.
                ***
                The long-married tell one another:
                Our memories are not what they used to be
                but in memory
                we are who we used to be:
                 your touch
                your touch alone
                and we slip slick
                into our 26 year-old bodies
                young  electric  and sleek

                no one else
                no one else
                can offer that
Next, some wonderful suggestions from the “To Do List for the Final Decades:”
                Fall in love in a foreign language.

                Compose a navigation song to chart your losses,
                And the way back.
                Learn to skate on the skin, the inexpressibly thin
                membrane where water meets air:
                master the skill of carving a caress
                into that tensile surface, a calligraphy
                as tender as hope.
And to finish, these lines that put me in mind of Leonard Cohen lyrics:
                Accommodate your own prodigal idealism: kill
                the fatted calf for truth; strike
                the timbrel, sing in the purpled
                shadows of dusk now, sing.

                Wave farewell with the torn
                scarf of your heart.
                Welcome into yourself the evening’s holy silence.
I can’t think of a better way to end in that song, or this review.


Caroline LeBlanc, former Army Nurse and civilian nurse psychotherapist, has had her essays and award winning poetry published in the US and abroad.  In 2010, Oiseau Press published Smokey Ink and a Touch of Honeysuckle, her chapbook about life as an Army wife and mother, and the descendent of 17thCentury Acadian/French Canadian settlers in North America. As past Writer in Residence at the National Military Family Museum, she wrote the script for the museum’s traveling exhibit, Sacrifice & Service; co-produced and co-created the script for Telling Albuquerque and 4 Voices stage performances; and facilitated Standing Down, a NM Humanities Council book discussion group for veterans and family members. With Mitra Bishop, Roshi, Mountain Gate Zen Center, New Mexico, she offers veterans and women military family members Day of Mindfulness Meditation & Writing Retreats.  She also serves as clinical staff for Mountain Gate Regaining Balance residential retreats for the same individuals.  Before leaving the Fort Drum, NY area, in 2012 she offered Writing For Your Lifeprograms to wounded warriors and military family members.  In 2011, Spalding University awarded her a Masters of Fine Arts in Creative writing.  Her art has won awards in New York and New Mexico.  She is a member of Albuquerque’s Rainbow Artists Collective, and a founding member of the Apronistas Collective of women artists who regularly mount community art shows highlighting women’s rights and ecological issues.   


Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Biography & an Interview with Gayle Lauradunn by Caroline LeBlanc

BIOGRAPHY

Gayle Lauradunn is a long time and key figure in the Albuquerque writing community, particularly the poety community where she has just completed a two year tenure as Chair of the Albuquerque chapter of the New Mexico Poetry Society. Under her leadership, the membership increased dramatically. I first met her when I began my gradual relocation here in 2011.  In Summer 2013, we both participated in a workshop with Louise Gluck at the Santa Fe University of Art and Design. Gayle workshoped several of the poems from Reaching for Air at that workshop, and they were well received. Until we all got too busy, Gayle and I were members of a five person poetry writing group.  The following biography is from Gayle.
Gayle Lauradunn reinvents herself about every five to seven years. Along the way she was co-organizer of the first National Women's Poetry Festival, a 6-day event held at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst in 1974. While there she earned a doctorate based on her dissertation for which she used 20th Century American poetry to create a curriculum to teach high school students about race, class, and gender. She learned about the crossover of race and class while living in the poor Black ghetto in Nashville, Tennessee. For five years she participated in the editorial collective that published Chomo-Uri: A Women's Literary and Arts Journal
After earning a B.A. in English Literature at the University of California, Berkeley, she became a feature writer for a weekly newspaper, and over the next 20 years worked as a free-lance journalist. Her anti-Vietnam War activism led her to being the Executive Director of the Veterans Education Project, a group of Vietnam, Korean, and Desert Storm veterans who spoke to high school students about the realities of war and military service.
As a single parent, she travelled extensively with her son throughout the United States, camping, backpacking, white water rafting, exploring museums and historical sites. An avid traveller, she has been to all 50 states and more than 20 countries, Bhutan and Antarctica being her favorites to date.
Her poems have been published in numerous journals, anthologies, and online. The poem "Telling" has been included in numerous anthologies, most recently VEILS, HALOES & SHACKLES: International Poetry on the Oppression and Empowerment of Women, published in Israel.

Interview

Thanks for agreeing to this interview.  I have to say that I am just blown away by the poems in your book.    After this, my 3rd reading I think I’m ready to ask some questions. Your book reads like a memoir, partly of a time forgotten by many in our affluent and urbanized society.  In fact, for me, the stories the poems tell personalize, even as they recall, scenes from The Grapes of Wrath. Here are my questions to you as the poet.

Caroline:  Would you speak about any autobiographical qualities of this book of poems?  Do you regard it as a memoir in verse?
Gayle:Thank you for the opportunity to address some issues I hope the book raises for people. I did not think about it as a memoir until the publisher put it in the double categories of Poetry/Memoir. This caused me to look at the poems differently. Of course, they are memoir, but I didn't set out to write memoir. It had never occurred to me to write one because I didn't want to re-live the pain, the ugliness, the hatefulness of my childhood. The poems began at the Squaw Valley Writers Conference in July 1991 where I spent the week working with Galway Kinnell, Lucille Clifton, C.K. Williams, and Sharon Olds. We were required to have a new poem every morning by 7 a.m. (which we learned after we arrived). I panicked as I had never written a poem a day. The house I shared with five other participants had three floors and the top floor had a balcony just big enough for one chair and a small table. I would sit there and look out across the valley to the mountains in the distance and let my mind go blank. An image, a vague memory, an incident would occur to me and I would write. Of the seven poems I wrote that week, four are in the book, two have been published in journals, and one I threw away.
Since my childhood is post-WWII, I've never thought to make a comparison to The Grapes of Wrath. In my mind, my family was not the Joads. But, of course, we were in many ways. However, I see your point and you've made me think about the comparisons. Which, actually, I prefer not to do.
After leaving Squaw I continued to write these poems over the next several years. What shocked me time after time was how each poem turned out, what each poem revealed to me. I realized that I had carried a burden all my life, that these images were constantly in my head and weighed on me. Since the book has been published, the burden has eased. Unfortunately, there are many more images; I could probably fill another book with such poems, and they occur to me frequently, but I need to move on to other content in my poetry so resist writing them.

Caroline:  Some poems are written in first person, some in third.  Would you say something about how you chose which voice to write in, and perhaps give us more insight into that choice by illustrating with a poem from each voice?
Gayle:I had to write in third person for the childhood poems as a means of gaining distance. It was much too painful to write them in first person with the exception of the few more light hearted ones. The adult voice is in first person because I had both time and geographical distance that allowed me to cope with the images. By the time these poems began, I had not been to Texas for 38 years and had been away from my family for 30 years, living 3,000 miles away in Massachusetts. A good example of a third person poem is:

Suspension
On the porch of broken boards
the child arranges stones into patterns.

Inside her mother wanders
from room to room. She leaves

the house only to stand
on the porch. Rubs her hands.

With slow feet the child
enters. Dries the dishes,

flowers faded and chipped
as though ants had dined.

Watches the hands. Feels
the first sting on her cheek.

Feels the hard leather
on her legs. Long curls snatched

in the hand. She dances a high
jig against the belt.

Tears and pleas will break
the silence. She refuses.

There is no way I could have written this poem in first person. I was always told the slaps were love pats, and I was ridiculed for crying about them. The belt was almost an everyday occurrence. Hence, my desire to escape, to go find the sheep and rattlesnakes.
An example of a first person poem is "Heritage". It takes place more than 16 years after leaving home.

Heritage
In the photograph my son and I stand
in Great-Great-Granddad's corn crib
built of poles glossy from years
of corn-husk polishing, ears fresh picked
to age for cattle feed, side by side
we face the camera, my arm across
his shoulder, my hand rests lightly there.
We stare beyond, as though to see the people
in sun-faded overalls walk the whispery
rows in west Texas heat, and I like to think,
in his child way, he understands what we do,
that he hears them call to each other
down the rows, that he brings their voices
with him into his music, those inward
songs children make of their world.
Since my family no longer lived in Texas and I would have no interference, I took my son who had just turned six to visit for the first time. He still remembers some things about the trip and tells me that these poems help him to recall other aspects. The poem "The Visit" reflects his ambivalence at the time. The focus of the trip was to show him locations and to let him know the contrast between the environment of my childhood and his in western Massachusetts. Also, I wanted him to meet his quite elderly great-grandparents since by then I could protect him from the harshness of my maternal grandmother.

Caroline:  The poems in Reaching for Air do indeed leave one breathless in the way they portray the emotional brutality of grinding poverty and a confusingly duplicitous religious, yet cruel, outlook toward life—particularly from the child’s point of view.  Roughly in what years are the poems set:  for the young girl in the beginning of the book, for the adult returning with her son and to visit her aging grandparents?
Gayle:Most of the poems for the young girl are set in the late 1940s; those of the woman 30-35 years later.
Caroline:Travel, animals and imagination figure large in these narrative poems.  They seem to offer a promise of relief and escape from the prison of poverty, drought, desert and sex-role expectations.  Would you say that is an accurate perception, and if so, share your thoughts about it?
Gayle:Yes, I agree. I took every opportunity to go outside the house, to be on my own, anything to be away from my mother, and my father when he was not working. I was 13 when we moved to Seattle and that was definitely a culture shock: from rural to city, from my Texas twang to the Northwest dialect, from all white (and a few "Mexicans") schools to a school with a mix of African-Americans and Asians, very few of which I had ever seen before. And, worst of all, no space to walk in, no open sky, no horizon to look toward, and no wild animals to relate to. I felt hemmed in with the tall trees and mountains. And, worst of all, very little sunshine. My way of leaving the house was to become involved in many organizations and to sign up for every committee both at school and with various organizations such as Girl Scouts.
I don't know where it came from, but at that young age I desired, absolutely craved, something different. It was more a gut feeling than one I could articulate. I felt there had to be a better life, a better way of being.
I started writing "poems" when I was nine and never stopped. These writings mostly expressed my frustration and anger and feelings of helplessness. I didn't know the word 'power' then but I felt powerless in the most extreme way.
Caroline:Despite the harshness of much of the content, compassion rings through for the various characters in these narrative poems.  How did you, as the writer, find your way to writing in such a factual, yet non-attacking manner?
Gayle:I let the facts and images speak for themselves. I try to write poems that tell a story, that paint a picture. I want the reader, or listener, to see and hear the story. I want readers to decide for themselves, based on the facts and images, how they feel and think about the various characters. We all like stories, whether they make us laugh, cry, or cringe. Stories are what we all remember. I want my poems to communicate to a broad audience and stories do that.
Caroline:  How long did it take you to write this book?  What did the process of writing it entail for you?
Gayle:It was written sporadically over a period of 15 or so years beginning in 1991. I wasn't trying to write a book, only poems as they occurred. In Massachusetts I was a member of a critique group that met weekly. Timothy Liu (https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poet/timothy-liu)was also a member for about 3 years and he was the person who said the poems make a book. I was surprised, but Tim insisted and created the first arrangement of the poems. The final arrangement is close to what he suggested although I did delete some poems and wrote new ones later that are included.
Until recently I have never been able to write consistently yet never stopped writing. Being a single parent with no money and poor health, I struggled through graduate school and numerous part-time jobs. My son also had health issues and between the two of us I spent a lot of time in doctors' offices. When my own issues were finally diagnosed in 1988, I was then able to work full time and not worry constantly about money. Writing was a compulsion, an obsession, something I needed to do that was all mine. I always wrote in a hurry and, therefore, wrote a lot of bad poems, never having the time to revise. I have stacks of those poems that I have looked through to determine what could possibly be salvaged. Very little, yet I hang on to them because, I think, they remind me of my journey.
Caroline:Please tell us of your journey to get Reaching for Air published?
Gayle:I sent the manuscript to about 40 publishers over some eight or ten years. During that time I continued to revise. In 2013 I took a workshop with Louise Gluck whose help and support were invaluable and gave me the courage to force the issue and self-publish. Over the years of this journey I began to realize from the comments that editors made, that they either didn't understand the poems or were in denial about the issues of class the poems raise. As a country we love to talk about, lament about, debate about, rant about racism. But we don't like to even mention class. I've noticed that when it is mentioned on the news, it is quickly passed over. As a child, I was painfully aware of the difference between my home and that of a few friends whose middle or upper middle class homes I was invited into, but I did not understand that this was part of the class difference. People don't like to admit that white people are poor. In 1976 I was invited to apply for a Danforth Foundation Grant for Women to help finance work on a graduate degree. The application form was lengthy and required several in-depth essays. On the third line of one of the essays I stated that I am white. Yet, when I arrived at Harvard University for an interview, the self-satisfied pompous white woman who had summoned me took one look at me and said "I thought you were black". End of interview. She couldn't imagine a white person having the experiences I had had.
In 1967 I was living in Nashville where my husband taught at Fisk University. We lived in the faculty housing that surrounded the campus that sits in the midst of the poorest part of the black ghetto (I don't know if anything has changed since I've never returned there). A few houses up the street Robert Hayden resided with his family. He asked to see my poems and I invited him for tea. Sitting in the living room the conversation turned to the location of the campus in the midst of such poverty. I'll never forget Bob's words as he gestured to the surrounding area "I have nothing to do with these people". That was my first instruction that class crosses racial and ethnic lines.
He was a wonderful man with whom I had a number of stimulating conversations. I was extremely pleased for him when he was named U.S. Poet Laureate. And, I will always be grateful to him for being the first to publish my poems. At the time he was poetry editor of the Baha'i journal World Order. About a year later two of my poems appeared in the journal.
Later that spring I had further instruction in the vagaries of class when I participated in a door-to-door survey conducted by a group of doctors who were determining whether to build a low-cost or free health clinic in either the poor black ghetto or the poor white ghetto. The questionnaire required about 45 minutes to ask people questions and record their responses. I was assigned homes in both ghettos. The residents had no idea I would be knocking on their doors. What a revelation! For the most part the white homes were a mess with clothes thrown everywhere and dishes piled up in the sink. The rooms were often filthy. The people spent a lot of time ranting about how they were better than the blacks (of course they used a different word) because they were white. By contrast, the black homes were poor, sometimes no better than shacks, but neat with clothes hung up on wooden pegs on the walls and everything clean. The people were polite and gracious although a bit uncomfortable with the white lady who came calling. These experiences reflected my own uneasy but not yet fully acknowledged awareness of and experience of the class divide.
Thanks to the pervasive denial about class in our society, I don't think Reaching for Airwould ever have seen the light of day unless I published it myself. I was gratified when it was named a Finalist for the Best First Book of Poetry by the Texas Institute of Letters.
Caroline: What are you working on now?
Gayle:My second poetry manuscript is completed and looking for a publisher. The title is All the Wild and Holy: a Life of Eunice Williams, 1696-1785, a book-length narrative poem in the voice of the historical figure of Eunice Williams. I was pleased that it received an Honorable Mention for the May Sarton Poetry Prize by Bauhan Publishing. Currently, I am writing a series of travel poems to reflect my passion for travelling to learn about the world and other peoples in more than a superficial manner. Another project is to write poems about the pre-historic Greek goddesses who were worshipped before the northern patriarchal invaders arrived and destroyed the power of women that threatened the warriors.
I have a number of poems stashed away that I've long thought of as singletons. Recently I pulled them all together and discovered that about 50 of them could comprise a manuscript. Over the next few months I'll be revising these and writing a few more that fit into the three sections I've divided them into.
On a completely different tack, I'm excited about writing my first novel. Since it is such a different process from writing poetry, it is a very steep learning curve. But I am enjoying it as well as the frustrations involved. The story is set in the late 18th century in the Scottish Highlands, then, through many misadventures, proceeds to Iceland, and ends in the Boston. It follows the woman's journey based on Joseph Campbell's hero's journey. It is the first book in a trilogy.
Caroline:  Thanks for your time, Gayle.  I look forward to seeing your manuscripts in script. 


Caroline LeBlanc, former Army Nurse and civilian nurse psychotherapist, has had her essays and award winning poetry published in the US and abroad.  In 2010, Oiseau Press published Smokey Ink and a Touch of Honeysuckle, her chapbook about life as an Army wife and mother, and the descendent of 17thCentury Acadian/French Canadian settlers in North America. As past Writer in Residence at the National Military Family Museum, she wrote the script for the museum’s traveling exhibit, Sacrifice & Service; co-produced and co-created the script for Telling Albuquerque and 4 Voices stage performances; and facilitated Standing Down, a NM Humanities Council book discussion group for veterans and family members. With Mitra Bishop, Roshi, Mountain Gate Zen Center, New Mexico, she offers veterans and women military family members day long Mindfulness Meditation/Mindful Writing Retreats.  She also serves as clinical staff for Mountain Gate Regaining Balance residential retreats for the same individuals.  Before leaving the Fort Drum, NY area, in 2012 she offered Writing For Your Lifeprograms to wounded warriors and military family members.  In 2011, Spalding University awarded her a Masters of Fine Arts in Creative writing.  Her art has won awards in New York and New Mexico.  She is a member of Albuquerque’s Rainbow Artists Collective, and a founding member of the Apronistas Collective of women artists who regularly mount community art shows highlighting women’s rights and ecological issues.   











Reaching for Air: Poems of Trauma & Relislience in a Poor White Country Girl's Life, a Review by Caroline LeBlanc

Reaching for Air


by Gayle Lauradunn

Mercury HeartLink Press, 2014.

ISBN 978-1-940769-17-2

Reaching for Air on Amazon



The poems in Reaching for Air capture, and celebrate, one person’s triumph over grinding poverty, as well as the multigenerational physical and emotional cruelty such poverty can engender.  These poems take the reader beyond racial, historical, and demographic stereotypes: they are about childhood hardships and abuse—physical and emotional—survived by a little white girl in poor, rural American around the middle of the 20th century.   In the attached interview, the poet states clearly that these poems are about her life, and describes how she finally put these difficult personal experiences on paper.  I’ve spoken to many people who want to, or are trying to do just that in a way that creates good poetry, as well as recounts personal experience.  If you are one of these people, and even if you’re not, this book is worth a read because the poems are compelling and just plain good quality.
The book’s fifty-five poems are divided into five sections, plus a prologue and epilogue.  Most are set in the parched and forbidding farmlands of west Texas.  The young girl’s experiences, related largely in the third person, drive most of the poems in this memoir-like collection of poems.  The other driving characters are: a father with wanderlust inherited from his mother, beaten over and over again by the weather and parched farms; a mother, angry about what her life has become, impotent against her husband’s willfulness, and all too ready to take her frustration and anger out on her young daughter.  The dynamics depicted in these mother-daughter poems recall how girls can be hated and mistreated by the very women who should love them  most, because these young girls are painful, jealously evoking, reminders of dreams and hopes forever lost to the grown woman.  
Grandparents are minor characters. The only kindness recorded is Granny’s gift of books “[t]hree times a year”.  However, in the child’s house, even the best of these treasures disappears, only to be found “later/shredded in the trash bin,” presumably by the jealous mother (“Gift”).” Even Sunday’s chicken dinner, and a bountiful peach harvest are tinged with cruelty. After every classically boring Sunday drive, Granddad kills a chicken in front of the child, immediately before the dinner when the child is expected to eat its meat (“Chicken Every Sunday”).  Sweet peaches become a cruel lesson about perceived ingratitude when she refuses yet another peach, and Granddaddy “pushes the golden fruit into her mouth,/the softness hard against her teeth “(“Re-Gold in Sunlight”).  

The only adult without malice seems to be Great-Uncle Buddy who “keeps us all entertained with his story.”  Turns out Great-Uncle Buddy lives in “the great white bed where he lies in fetal position” and has since he was paralyzed at age 17 after he was “thrown from a mule.”  Who had cared for this man is not clear, but he alone among the clan seems free of the cruel rage sprouting from despair and poverty.  The last lines of the poem are: “The skin stretches/over his parchment face as he grins/with the humor he’s invented to keep us there” (“Punch Lines”). And the family was starved for humor.

As is so often the case when the personal mother and/or father is unable to nurture a child, the child in these poems finds solace in nature:  flowers, turkeys, sheep, cows, horses, even snakes.  Not surprisingly, the parents are hardened to and insensitive about even this.  In “At the Zoo” the parents force, then watch, their terrified child ride a circus elephant.  One imagines that they could not understand why the child was not happier and more appreciative about this treat.  Still, the child pulls through, as the “elephant lifts its feet/in rhythm with soft drumming,/sways its stately body/in a cradle song.”  One takes soothing where one can find it.

“Dehorning Molly” is particularly compelling.  It seems Molly is one of the child’s favorite cows, whom she “strokes in rhythm.//traces a white patch over the nose.”   Then:

                Into this animal world
                the men come:
                her father, her uncle,
                the neighbor Mr. Renfrow.
                They carry thick ropes
                and a saw with jagged teeth.
                A thick piece of lumber.

                The child looks out to the field
                 sprouting white bolls.
                 A light breeze
                stirs her hair.
                Through the bellows
                she hears
                the rasp of the saw.

                Later, her father said
                she was too frisky,
                butting into the barn,
                tossing her head
                as though those horns
                meant something.

Clearly, the misogynistic message was not lost on the child.  Yet, despite these wearying incidents of cruelty, the child continues to seek refuge in the natural world, and even manages to redeem some tragic habits of past generations, particularly through travel in the outer and inner world.  “The Visit” recounts the time she took her young son back to her “genesis under west Texas//sky.  He shrinks in this alien landscape/while [she] can breathe again.” She compassionately shows him things intimately familiar to her, yet alien to him.

             On the sheep-graze we find my refuge           
              the oak clump of childhood solitude.
              I tell him to keep walking

              if we see a rattler. It is harmless
             if uncoiled. I forget he has not known
             
             this since he could walk. His tears

             surprise me.  I point to shapes
             in the clouds, in the sky
             
             that surrounds him. On the ground


              he draws in the dirt with his finger,
              refuses to look up. His eye unused

              to travelling so far.

In “Birth Rite,” the book’s closing poem, the poet recounts how her father caught her mother eating dirt early in the pregnancy with this future poet. (For those who don’t know, as I didn’t before I took care of my first pregnant patient from the rural South, eating dirt is a bit of a tradition in the South, particularly poor, hungry, and malnourished pregnant women).  For me, the poem calls to mind the Tibetan Book of the Dead, where one confronts the elemental reality of one’s physical non-existence, and in the end lives more fully.  Forever finding comfort in nature, rather than adversity as her ancestors did, the poet writes,
                Perhaps being bread on worms
                is ok    it gives me
                my love of nature
                my desire to be in the woods
                in the mountains
                near the ocian (sic)

Her imaginary journey into the soil, the earth with its worms continues:


                they are at home in the dark
                slowly my arms sink
                into the dirt
                a soft slither startles me
                worms creep up and
                over my back
                at first a few but finally
                hundreds
                i nod good day
                and go on digging

                the ridges of my knuckles
                flex
                each finger drops off
                at the joint and
                inches away
                worms basking
                on my back slough off
                and dig beside me
                the tunnels stretch
                into a glow
                ahead I see a spoon

The poems in Reaching for Air are straight forward in their style and the stark honesty of their content.   They tell of the tragic paradox of misguided love, for I am sure that if asked, the parents and grandparents in these poems would say they loved their daughter, and that would be the justification for their behavior. The poems tell of the resilience of a young girl, grown into a woman who can look at the past honestly, and step into the future with courage.  In no way are they self-indulgent or self-pitying.  That fact, and the poet’s craft, especially the rich sensory descriptive details in the poems,  makes reading this book a rewarding, dare I say joyful, experience.  The collection contains previously secret truths from one person’s life, and the skillful telling invites readers to examine other truths hidden in our collective and personal lives.






Wednesday, 30 July 2014

A HEROINE BY ANY OTHER NAME: POETRY & RESILIENCE IN OUR VIOLENT WORLD




 Local News from Someplace Else
           by Marjorie Maddox

             Wipf & Stock, Eugene, Oregon
             2103

             13:978-1-62564-094-9
             
            Visit Amazon's Marjorie Maddox Page


 The History of Bearing Children
by Jacqueline Murray Loring Doire Press, Co. Galway,Ireland
2012
978-0-9827470-9-4

Available for purchase at the Cultural Center of Cape Cod
I’ve only recently had the pleasure of meeting Marjorie Maddox, long distance.  After my December 2013 review of Barbara Crooker’s, Gold, Marjorie contacted me about reviewing her new book of poems, Local News from Someplace Else.   As it turns out, Marjorie lives in one of the most beautiful regions of Pennsylvania, where I was fortunate enough to live from 1977 to 1982, and I recognize a number of the places she refers to in her poems.  In fact, my sons used to love going to Clyde Peelings Reptile Land,  described in a poem by that title.   
About the same time as Marjorie introduced herself to me, I met poet and sister Southwest Writer member, Jacqueline Murray Loring, who contacted me for information about the Women Veteran’s Writing Salon I host.  Jacqueline gave me a copy of her chapbook, The History of Bearing Children, and asked if I would consider reviewing it. 

It was a too difficult choice to make, and, after reading both books, I realized that they shared a concern with the incursion of violence/tragedy into modern life—whether through first or second hand experience.   Consequently, I decided to ask both poets the same questions and to examine poems from each book in relation to the other.

Since meeting, Jacqueline and I have participated in several projects together, including 4 Voices on the 4th,  a spoken word performance about military family life which I directed as Writer in Residence at the Museum of the American Military Family.  As script writer for the MAMF exhibit, Sacrifice & Service: The American Military Family, I also included Jacqueline’s poem, “Braving the Storm,” on our “Return & Re-integration” panel.   Jacqueline is also a family member performer in Telling, Albuquerque, our local production of The Telling Project which I am co-producing/writing with Max Rayneard, Senior Writer/Producer for The Telling Project
(http:// thetellingproject.org ) .  

We cannot get away from violence/tragedy in our world, though we can make a good stab at it if we live in the right place and have the right amount of money.  Even then, as the title of Maddox’s book, Local News from Someplace Else, implies, the daily news brings us reports of violence/tragedy from around the world.  Although no more than 1% of the US population has a member of the family serving in the US armed forces, hundreds of thousands American men and women have served in combat during our last thirteen years of war.  Their return and reintegration into family and community is too often complicated by the physical and /or emotional wounds of combat. This was also true of those returning from the war, about half a century ago, which set Loring on the path of wife to a Vietnam veteran.  The History of Bearing Children recounts the effects of war on the returning soldier, spouse and family.  In the books under review, Maddox and Loring, each take on matters easier swept under the rug. 

Local News, with its three sections and 65 poems, includes poems prompted by both tragic and comic headlines, as well as mainstream family concerns.  Throughout Local News, Maddox weaves the tragic, the comic and the heart warming. The book’s last poem, “A.M.: INSIDE AND OUT,” ends with “our two small ones trailing after us/ into the wonderfully, brightening world.”  Maddox has looked at the darkness and come out into “the hills/ that belch so early, ‘Hello, hello, good morning.’”   


History, with its 32 poems, offers us pictures of how a wife and family can choke for years in the aftermath of the early life war experience of one of its members. Loring’s last poem “The Supplanter Walks on Water,” ends with “I see my life/ a series of storm tides, crashing/ waves, sky-blue-pinks and blues,/ a rippled sand bar.”  Two poems earlier, she writes, “I see my diamond sparkle,” the book’s most hopeful line, and the poem’s last after 9 lines of increasingly frightening images in “Triple Canopy.”  This after the previous poem, “Curse the Rainbow,” ends with “Still, the sky clears, our bed stays warm,/our children grow, fathered by that/ uncursed piece of you we hold.” She also finds the good, the possible in life, in the midst of its rubble.      


After considering several organizational schemes, I decided to structure the discussion according to a condensed heroine’s journey outline in Maureen Murdock’s The Heroine’s Journey, her variation on Joseph Campbell’s The Hero’s Journey—both books worth the read, if you haven’t already.  Having spent twenty+ years as Jungian psychotherapist, I find archetypal layers in many things.  My apologies to the poets if I am reading things they did not intend into their poems. In my opinion, poems in both of these books illustrate stages of the heroine’s journey, and writing them required that each of the poets undertake their own version of the heroine’s journey.  The books contain accounts of wrestling with darkness in the process of birthing self in relationship with others:  spouse, children, and anonymous others who impact their lives through personal contact or the media.  Both compassionately imagine and engage their own and others’ sufferings and, to some extent, joys, however fleeting. In this review, we will look at ten poems, two for each of the following stages of the heroine’s journey:  her ordinary life; her call to the heroine’s journey; her trials; her underworld experience; and her step onto the road of return, or in more mythological language, rebirth.

~~

Ordinary Life:  Most of us quite reasonably want a happy, comfortable, and rewarding life.  Some of us are lucky enough to get it.  What ends ups being ordinary for one person may not be ordinary for another. And poems about ordinary life events, especially those written from the distance of time and experience, often contain foreboding about the challenges life, or fate, will throw in along the way.

Loring’s poem, “Engagement,” starts with a trip to Boston antique shops to find just the right ring.  The search brings back memories of her Aunt’s stories that “in the sun along the riverbanks/of the South China Sea stones lie,/fill with hope, wait for lovers.”  Romantic images on first reading, and until the reader realizes that Vietnam is on the South China Sea.  The ring, with its smooth jade stone and sharp cut diamonds, is “[a] part of my life,” what outsiders see as well as the meaningful and mundane chores of family life.  To this point we have a moving poem about the symbolism of a jeweled ring.  It could easily fall into sentimentality.  Like a snake in the South Asian jungle, the poem turns, at first, almost without our noticing. “Sometimes in sunlight/I caress it, stare into the opaque green/ consider my vows, imagine/other settings, aunt’s yarns”—but these are not yarns about “scarabs and jade” in rivers.  These are “yarns/ of damsels in distress, a captive princess,/lady warrior: all with blessed hands/they wore their rings into battle.”  The poem ends with the tension of these images, moving us from the smooth “jade” life to the sharp facets of a cut diamond, a marriage that will also be a kind of battle ground.
~

Like a number of Maddox’s poem, “Indelible,” is a tongue in cheek account of an absurd mythological-underworld-like wedding where the groom added a wedding ring tattoo to his extensive body art.  In a delightful play on image and word, the wedding included on the spot tattooing, after which “fuchsia-dyed cake injected,/ inconveniently, with badly burnt brandy/ was cut in precise slices.”  And here, with this “fuchsia-dyed cake…/ …placed on a skin of napkin//which is what I ate,” we slide into a hint of Persephone’s story of eating the pomegranate seed, which forever joins her to her underworld lover. But the speaker inverts the image.  She ate the cake deliberately “the moment I saw your permanent eyes, /a half-heart tattooed so vividly/ on each matching lid.” This could be an applied tattoo, but I read it as the delicate web of blood vessels often visible on human eyelids. Consequently, instead of being imprisoned in the underworld, this cake eater lands in the world of the ordinary love, remembering, however, the “burnt taste” hint about what other elements ordinary life might entail.          
~~

The Call:  Historically, child birth has been an ordeal of the order of male combat, since so many women lost their lives in the birthing bed.  While modern women seldom die in childbirth, and have more control over questions of whether and /or when to become a mother, pregnancy remains a tricky threshold event.  Pregnancy opens the door into what happens after the pregnancy—whether it be the loss of a child or the obligation to raise a child to adulthood.  It is such a womanly and common patch that it seldom gets recognized for the heroic series of ordeals that it entails.

~

In Maddox’s “PLEA TO AN EMBRYO,” the speaker, in the voice of a parental “we,” addresses her unborn child, barters with the embryo inside her about all the things a parent and teenager barter about.  The bitter sweet implication is that the embryo is as willful as a human adolescent.  The dream, hope, plea is that the fetus will stay put in the womb long enough to have a chance at becoming an adolescents.  This child is wanted and already loved, and the parents who love her beg her to “Wait, take your first breath. Think/before you split/ into nothingness.  You’re still//under our roof/and rules.”  The speaker seems to understand that she has a greater chance of enforcing rules with a rebellious adolescent than she does of forcing the unstable fetus to “[s]tay put.” The poem, its tone rooted in good old fashioned sympathetic magic, ends with a variation on one of the most common promises made by exasperated parents, “you’ll understand/ if you’re older.”  If the poem has not already left the reader breathless, the substitution of “if” for “when” will knock the wind out of her.


In Loring’s “Perpetual Ritual,” the “normal” dynamics of mother/fetus/father are intruded upon by the husband/father’s flashback from his time in Vietnam.  All starts well.  “My finally pregnant belly/ outlined safe and high, adjusts to your gentle rocking.//I watch you/stroke our unborn child.” As if the poet counted, bad luck enters on line 13 when the father’s “suddenly closed eyes” cue eight lines of “booby-trapped memoirs” about the wartime death of a pregnant Vietnamese woman, “her yellow gaping belly, that child,/your bloody friends all dying.” The speaker also grieves, “I kiss your mouth too late/ to save you from this battle.”  And, as happens after every death, there is eventual resignation and acceptance, and the rhythms of life go on, however stark and limping.  The last line reads, “In the morning I’ll change our sheets.”  These parents do not seem to be in danger of losing their child, but the traumas of war leave them both in danger of being lost to that child and each other as they embark on the simultaneous journeys of child rearing, and recovery from combat related trauma.
~~

Trials:  Carl Jung said that if we do not choose to follow our destiny, it will come to us as fate—tempted or survived.  Professor Elizabeth Vandiver of the University of Maryland defines the “fatal flaw” as a past decision that has negative consequences the character did not foresee when we made the choice.  Once she has answered the call to the heroine’s journey, the heroine must make the best choices she is capable of and hope they are the choices that will lead her to the treasure.

~

In Maddox’s poem TWICE, a man and a teenage woman, with no connection to one another, both survive their encounters with lightening.  TWICE is written in couplets with an irregular pattern of near rhymes.  And I must mention the lovely, and humorous (in a black-humor way) allusions Maddox works into the narrative, which serve to lift the mundane story into at least the literary, and perhaps the archetypal, heights.  When he was struck the man was below a “split tree/ spead-eagle above him like a Frost poem/wounded. And that made all the difference.”  Meanwhile, the teen fell victim to “lightning’s long finger tapping her twice,/ a parody of the daVinci painting? /For weeks she was a celebrity.”  Both tempted fate and both won.  To this point, this is a nice narrative poem, with some classic allusions. But as in many of her poems, Maddox follows the story with reflective stanzas. 


            But what odds we all give and take,
            daily loading blank dice into our hopeful palms.

            Bad things happen in threes,
            but its twice, the highly unlikely, 

            that slips in in the middle
            and slips us up.

Maddox could end the poem on this hopeless note. Instead she ends with a challenge to “the survivors of ‘bad things,’ / of storms blindingly fierce and electric.”  Storms—natural, emotional, bodily—that leave us asking if

            even on clear, bright days,
            will we continue, with hope

            or fear, to look up straight
            into whatever warms us?  

We could claim, as the poet reports the papers said, “He is a fool,…/and should have known better.”  But, in fairy tales it is often the fool who survives the trials, finds the treasure, rescues the captive, returns home.  Heroes and heroines often tempt fate, remain or go when good sense cautions the opposite.  There’s the famous line the Russian-Fairy-Tale-Ivan answers to Baba Yaga’s terrifying question, “Were you forced to come or did you come of your own free will?” The correct answer is “Both.”  If not before, then certainly after she is a survivor, after she had answered the call, each heroine—dare I say, each poet, writer, mother, wife, et. al.—must decide if she will continue “to look up straight / into whatever warms [her].”  TWICE is a good example of how Maddox takes tragic or quirky headlines, and invites her reader to reflect on what they represent when considered from a meta-perspective.
~
Loring’s “Curse the Rainbow” also recounts a thunder and lightning storm. “Curse” is almost a concrete poem, in that the lines flash about, much as lightning bolts would, until the poem resolves and the last four stanzas settle down.  The images are reminiscent of combat and war: “the sky brightens,” “children flee… / after scattered horses,” “mist…blurs your face/criss-crosses your eyes,” “[y]our plea through distant thunder.”  “[L]ightning / strikes” and “pounding memory / darts/ among / the branches.” And then the flashback: “that girl /who still runs from her burning skin.”  Even the wife’s response is full of war imagery:  “blood red sunset,” I “damn the storm, the barbed wire between us, / want to scrape napalm / into your memory / to ease your pain.”  How bad must the pain be if napalm would feel better?  How desperate must a woman be to consider napalm a possible cure?  How desperate was our government to douse Vietnam with napalm?  You get the idea. 


The next seven lines are full of despair and hopelessness.  “[N]either your laughing children / nor my patient love / can keep you / from this moment. // I wonder if I can go on.”  Again, the poem could end here, but the poet, like the heroine she is hangs onto a thread of courage and determination, and a vision of coming through the ordeal. The poem’s last lines, also cited earlier, introduce the speaker’s resilience and devotion in the face of challenges that would send many others packing. 


            Still the sky clears, our bed stays warm,
            our children grow, fathered by that
            uncursed piece of you we hold.

~~
The Underworld:  You might well object, “Have we not already been mucking around in the underworld?  It sure feels like it.”  True, the tone of the poems has gotten dark.  But the underworld implies surrender, a dying to all one has clung to for a sense of self and place in the world, and our previous poems ended on hopeful notes.  Hope is false in the underworld, even if we pray desperately for it to not be so. It is important to not conflate the heroine’s journey underworld with any religious conceptions of hell as a place of punishment for wrong doers.  It is an all too neutral place of darkness where the heroine realizes that cherished formulas for a good, happy life do not guarantee that life. The gods and fate are fickle.

~
Loring’s poems “Forward” begins, as many of hers do, with a homely task—this time cleaning the china cabinet.  Two items set the course of the poem.  First there is the tea set her aunt sent from Japan, when her aunt “was young / and thought a crisp salute / was the only price she’d pay / for her freedom.”  A sentimentally archaic image for an archaically naive belief.  Next the poet reaches “back into my yesterdays / to other teas and services,” specifically her wedding with its “forgotten …vows and promises.”  This is a very ambiguous line. What kind of forgetting is recalled?  The words of the ceremony, or has the spirit of the words been forgotten in the reality of her marriage?  She continues her chore—in her dining room and in the  poem.  "[I] unwrap the porcelain bride and groom / who stood guard for us in frosting, / touch the bride's cold cheek / follow her lace bodice to her band, // the groom's left are, waiting, / trace the tear-drop beads / painted on her graying gown / wipe dust from her eyes."
Like the rich poem it is, “Forward”  presents us with a simple story even as its images entangle us in multiple levels of meaning: from “forgotten wedding vows and promises,” to enduring porcelain that “stood guard” over dreams as insubstantial as frosting, to cold cheeks (no longer warm in the flush of romantic love), to “tear-drop beads.”  All these images tell us of romantic love, tarnished by war, and tested by years.  Romantic notions, which the poet has tried carefully to hold onto along with the other fragile treasures from her earlier life, have proved misleading.  They have not stood the test of time.  When she wipes the dust from the statuette’s eyes, she wipes the dust from her own eyes which “look through the pane / of the still-open door.”  Leaving remains an option. The door is “still-open.”  She could leave this heroine’s journey with its trials, try for a simpler, more ordinary life.  Instead, she watches her “aproned reflection, // move goblets to hide the groom.”  She stays, but she “buries” the notion of the romantic handsome groom and what, for her, has become a fairy tale version of marriage marketed by the wedding industry.  As the marital enrichment movement folks maintain, a wedding does not a marriage make.  The wife in this poem has accepted her consignment to the underworld that is her marriage.  She has surrendered to her fate, which does not include the kind of marriage she hoped for as a young bride.  
~
Even if you have never driven through dead and dying mining towns around the world, a careful reading of Maddox’s poem, “Minersville Diner,” will give you a good sense of the barrenness the industry creates, and the even greater despair it leaves behind once it has exploited the people and the land’s resources.  It represents the underbelly of the good life most people seek.  It is a manmade underworld which I visited many times when I was a consulting occupational health nurse with the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety (now defunct). 


People not relegated to life in dead company towns, even if they are visiting family rooted there, are always and only “[e]n route to somewhere else,” someplace implicitly better.  They are uneasy with the stark surroundings, at once stifled and titillated by the intensity and dramatic despair of the place.  Yet,  the place is paradoxically somehow more invigorating than the suburban “dust of who-walked-out-on- whom,/ … our [own] abandoned mines of what is worse / than flipping fried eggs alone.”  The tone of the poem reminds me of when, as a nursing student struggling with my own late adolescent depression, I would find perspective and a new energy for life when faced with the suffering of patients in the inner city teaching hospitals.  There is a hierarchy to suffering, which does not negate the fact that no suffering feels inconsequential when we are in the middle of it. A visit to the Minersville Diner hits us over the head with the fact that, despite what corporate America and Madison Avenue tells us, the American dream does not guarantee “the good life” or freedom from painful experiences.


The poet’s image of the hot, cracked sidewalks before the diner takes us to the tenacity humans display when faced with surrendering to the vagaries of the underworld.  As we should, we plan and scheme, and try with all our might to create a better life for ourselves and our loved ones for,        “[w]ithout the planned gaps, / there’s be a hundred tiny fractures / in concrete, breaking more / than mothers’ backs.”  We care for ourselves and each other with restaurants and bakeries, “‘Coming soon!’”  We build churches to protect us from the fickleness of fate, to find peace with our place in things.  Yet, even with the “blue dome of the church, its painted god stars winking knowingly, … we pass into the life we [can only] pretend is safe from explosion, from unexpected and total collapse.”

“Minersville Diner” recounts the speaker’s travels through and respect for the underworld, rather than her personal time served in that forsaken place.  But her astute observations of the reality and how it lies in wait for each of us, make it quite clear that she is no stranger to its existential realities.  In this poem the speaker serves as something of an experienced mentor or guide, for those who would dare undertake the heroine’s journey.      
~~
Return/Rebirth: The most stripped down description of the archetypal cycle is life, death, and rebirth.  Not all heroes and heroines complete the cycle.  In myth, fairy tales and stories, the rebirth or resurrection represents the climax of the story.  The denouement, or the resolution, of the story involves the heroine’s successful return with the treasure or elixir of life, etc. The return is often the step most difficult to accomplish. The next two poems place the poet on the cusp of rebirth, on the lip of the birth canal.  Their creations, including the books under review, are proof that they got the treasure back to the ordinary world, which is forever changed as a result.

~

Interestingly, winter storms figure in both “The Nor’easter” by Loring and “Ithaca Winter” by Maddox.  What better image of death and the underworld than winter, and its accompanying frozenness, death, burial under mounds of snow?

In its eight lines, “The Nor’easter”  “helps focus survival thoughts / empties my head of inside things."  All her other troubles are small compared to life or death situations, be they literal or figurative.  When you are in the underworld, your every thought is for survival and return to the living.  Next is the “swirl of stripped leaves, / whip of limbs, /the pelt of rain,” all classic images of internal turmoil as well as external storms. Still, the poet fears the next step, the sacrifices demanded if she is to be released from the stormy underworld of her war torn life. 


The heroine writes, “I latch shutters, / resist the howling / of what wants out.”  Is she caught in her fear of the next step, the sacrifices required to be released from the underworld of her war torn life?  Is she refusing to leave a dangerous situation that someone, not so foolish, would walk away from?  Or is she simply closing the shutters in order to seal herself in an alchemical container?  We have only to read the last three lines together to find the answer: “resist the howling / of what wants out / on paper.” 


The line breaks in “Nor’easter,” especially in the last two stanzas allow for multiple readings and create tiered meanings.  As is her way, Loring creates depths of meaning through the intensity and intensely personal nature of her imagery.   She is not a mere confessional poet, nor are her descriptions of violence in any way gratuitous.  They are her lived experience and the lived experience of thousands of family members in love and relationship with men and women who served in the combat theaters of our nation’s wars, even when our political leaders sent them to fight in questionable conflicts.  Loring’s writing gives us profound, skillful, and poignant documents about the challenges of not simply surviving, but also redeeming, combat related traumas through the creative process. 
~
“Ithaca Winter” by Maddox, is about a woman who goes into a winter storm to “undo who I was.” To let the wind “[unzip] / eventually what isn’t.” To let the snow “white-out absence,/ lost the clean slate entirely.”  The last is an extremely stark image of wished-for self-annihilation.  Until the penultimate stanza the poem consists of a beautifully lyrical, yet rather one-dimensional narrative about an existential crisis of some sort.  The speaker is in so much pain she almost wishes for death in the underworld.  Then, the first line of the penultimate stanza catapults us out of sequential time and narrative.  “I had a life disappear once.” When was once? Just before the events of the previous four stanzas, or another time?  The rest of the stanza leaves me wondering.  “I stepped out if it into the snow / …an old name and sorrow / stuck at the bottom in a drift.”  Did the life disappear or did she leave it behind?  The life or the disappeared life?  Are they the same?


This poem makes the reader work hard.  It’s a good thing the language is so beautiful.  A definite but only implied shift occurs into the last stanza.  The shift is reminiscent of a major scene change in cinema or TV.  We aren’t prepared for the shift but, if we pay attention to details, we realize we are in a different setting.  “When I stopped shivering, behind my teeth were words.”  If the speaker stopped shivering, then she either froze to death, or she came in from the cold.  My vote?  She came out of her winter underworld, out of its cold. But while her teeth chattered in the cold, they tapped out, quite musically in this poem, the words that now fill her mouth and, implicitly, wait to be—or have been—put to paper.
~ 

As a last point, let’s consider the imagery, explicit and implied, of the color white in these last two poems. In Western culture, white is most often a symbol of new life, rebirth.  And the color white works this way in both these poems.
In the third stanza of ‘Ithaca Winter,” Maddox creates a very paradoxical and idiosyncratic list  of the symbolic qualities of snow. This she follows with a question which forms the fourth stanza.  “What better white/ to white-out absence, lose the clean slate entirely?” After more snow imagery in stanza five, the last stanza reads, “When I stopped shivering, / behind my teeth were words.”  Here, the poet implies, rather than represents, the white piece of paper upon which she will write of her journey.  And she implies it with another white object—her teeth, which she sinks into the telling of her heroine stories in her prolific writing.


While Loring cites “pelts of rain” rather than images of snow, the title “Nor’easter” conjures a winter storm which, for me, suggests snow.  In fact, until I started my careful re-readings for this review, my mind substituted images of “snow” for “rain.”  Be that as it may, the poem starts with a Nor’easter, a winter storm, and ends with “what wants out,” i.e. words, “on paper.”  Paper, the blank white page, is virginal, as all mythological heroines are when they are reborn. The blank page waits for the poet to pen the story of her journey with the treasures she’s brought back to benefit her world.
~~
Those of us fortunate enough to never have had violence/tragedy, and their aftermath, intrude first hand into our lives have little reason to deeply contemplate how it—and our denial of it— impacts our families and  society.  And it is not only war or school shootings in suburban schools that scream for attention.  The poor, the ethnically, religious, and racially disenfranchised in America and the world, civilians in war torn areas, imprisoned and/or displaced people around the world—these and others live daily with suffering caused by violence and class related tragedies . We can easily be overwhelmed with the weight of it all. And yet, even if we don’t live in such conditions, or go to war, or love someone who has, most of us watch the evening news, as well as movies and TV shows about war, tragedies, danger and heroism.  Maddox and Loring, in their resilient poems, redeem our often macabre fascination in their poems.  They debunk feel good feature stories, and digest headlined and personal experiences of the sequela of violence and tragedy.  Their poems serve up their reflections, invite readers to ingest the bitter as well as the sweet offerings on the table.  In this way, they cull some redemption out of otherwise senseless happenings.


Veterans and their families are, and are not, terribly different from other Americans. They, like others, including many poets and the disenfranchised featured in the headlines Maddox contemplates, know that suffering cannot be avoided.  They have joined the ranks of those who know it is difficult, if not impossible, to bargain with the gods. They know that feeling betrayed when the gods are erratic in their regard for human welfare is self-deluding, however understandable.  Marion Woodman insists that we can suffer neurotically, or we can suffer redemptively, the latter a requirement for living more consciously. Loring and Maddox are resilient women and poets of witness who write about that which many would rather not see.  They give voice to the unspoken, some would say the unspeakable.  In the process they contribute to the redemption of the suffering that motivated their writing. Their two quite different books share deep truths, and give voice to shunned, yet compelling, human experiences, with compassion, and without swinging a political ax.  








Caroline LeBlanc, MFA, MS, RN is Writer in Residence at the Museum of the American Military Family. Presently she is co-producer/writer for Telling, Albuquerque, (part of the national Telling Project) a 9/11/2104 testimonial theatrical event where military veterans and family members perform their own stories.  In 2014 she directed 4 Voices on the 4th, a collaborative spoken word performance with three other women military family members.  Since relocating to Albuquerque in 2013, she has hosted a writing salon for women military veterans and family members.  In 2011 Spalding University awarded her an MFA in Creative Writing.  Her poems have been published in her 2010 chapbook, Smoky Ink and a Touch of Honeysuckle, as well as online and in a number of print journals.  Her art pieces have also been included in a number of group shows in the Albuquerque area.